Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

 VMWare SRM “Like” Options for SCVMM Hyper-V


Overview

In a Microsoft Hyper-V environment managed by System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM), there isn't a direct one-to-one equivalent of VMware Site Recovery Manager (SRM), but similar functionality can be achieved through a combination of Microsoft tools and features:

Comparable MS Integrated Solutions to VMware SRM in SCVMM/Hyper-V:


1. Azure Site Recovery (ASR)

  • Closest equivalent to SRM for Hyper-V/SCVMM environments.
  • Provides orchestration, automation, and replication for disaster recovery (DR) scenarios.
  • Supports planned failover, unplanned failover, and test failover, just like SRM.
  • Integrates with SCVMM to replicate VMs between on-premises sites or to Azure.
  • Supports Hyper-V clusters, CSVs, and SCVMM clouds.

2. SCVMM + Hyper-V Replica (Manual DR Orchestration)

  • Hyper-V Replica allows asynchronous VM replication between two Hyper-V hosts/sites.
  • Can be managed and monitored in SCVMM, but lacks the full orchestration and automation of SRM.
  • Requires manual scripting or orchestration (e.g., PowerShell, Orchestrator, or Azure Automation) for failover plans and testing.
  • Suitable for smaller environments or less complex DR requirements.

3. System Center Orchestrator

  • Can be used with SCVMM and Hyper-V Replica to build custom DR workflows.
  • Allows automation of failover sequences, dependency handling, IP address changes, etc.
  • Adds orchestration layer but still lacks the simplicity and GUI-driven DR planning of SRM.


 

Summary Comparison Table

Feature

VMware SRM

Azure Site Recovery (ASR)

Hyper-V Replica + SCVMM

DR Orchestration

Yes

Yes

No (manual/custom)

GUI Failover Planning

Yes

Yes

No

Test Failover

Yes

Yes

Manual

Replication Type

Array-based or vSphere

Host-based (Hyper-V or Azure)

Host-based (Hyper-V)

Integration with SCVMM

N/A

Yes

Yes

Automation/Customization

Yes

Yes

Yes (with Orchestrator)

Failback Support

Yes

Yes

Manual

 


 

Azure Site Recovery with SCVMM and Hyper-V – DR Architecture Guide

Scenario

Organization is managing an on-premises Hyper-V environment with SCVMM, and they  want automated disaster recovery between:

  • Two on-premises datacenters (Site A → Site B), or
  • On-premises to Azure (Site A → Azure region)

High-Level Architecture (On-Prem to Azure)

On-Premises Datacenter (Site A)
├── Hyper-V Hosts (Clustered or Standalone)
    └── Production VMs
├── System Center Virtual Machine Manager (SCVMM)
├── ASR Provider installed on SCVMM server
├── Configuration Server (or Azure Site Recovery Unified Setup)
    └── Handles replication, orchestration, monitoring
└── Internet or ExpressRoute connection to Azure
 
Azure Recovery Services Vault (in target Azure region)
├── Replica storage (Azure Storage)
├── Target virtual network
└── Automation and orchestration via ASR

Prerequisites

On-Premises:

  • SCVMM 2016 or later
  • Hyper-V 2016 or later
  • At least one Recovery Services Vault in Azure
  • An Azure subscription
  • Internet access (or ExpressRoute) from SCVMM & hosts to Azure
  • Optional: Active Directory sync or AAD DS for seamless identity post-failover

 

Agents/Software:

  • Install Azure Site Recovery Provider on SCVMM server
  • Register SCVMM with the Azure Recovery Services Vault
  • Install Mobility service on each Hyper-V VM (can be pushed via SCVMM or Config Server)

Deployment Steps

1. Create a Recovery Services Vault in Azure

  • Use Azure Portal > Recovery Services Vault > Create
  • Choose region (this is where replicated VMs will go)

2. Prepare SCVMM and Register with Vault

  • Download the ASR Provider from Azure Vault
  • Install it on the SCVMM server
  • Register SCVMM with the Vault using generated key

3. Configure Replication Settings

  • Define clouds, storage accounts, and target networks in Azure
  • Map on-prem VM networks → Azure VNet

4. Enable Replication for VMs

  • In SCVMM or Azure Portal, select VMs or VM groups
  • Define replication policy (RPO, retention, app-consistent snapshots)
  • ASR installs the Mobility agent if not present

5. Create Recovery Plans (like SRM runbooks)

  • Define failover groups (VM order, scripts, pause steps)
  • Set boot order, post-failover scripts, etc.

6. Test Failover

  • Run a test failover to isolated Azure network
  • Validate connectivity, application functionality

7. Plan Failover/Failback

  • Initiate planned/unplanned failover from Azure Portal
  • After restoration, failback can be automated or manual depending on configuration

 

Benefits vs SRM

Feature

Azure Site Recovery

VMware SRM

Cloud DR Target

Azure (built-in)

vSphere or cloud with add-ons

Built-in Monitoring

Yes (Azure Monitor, Log Analytics)

Yes (vCenter, SRM plugin)

Cost Model

Pay-as-you-go (DR as a service)

Licensing + infra cost

Scriptable Recovery Plans

Yes

Yes


Security Considerations

  • Ensure TLS 1.2+ on all servers
  • Monitor with Azure Security Center
  • Use RBAC to limit access to DR management
  • Enable MFA on all Azure operations

 

Zerto Option for SCVMM Hyper-V Clustering Environment

Zerto can be used instead of Azure Site Recovery (ASR) or VMware SRM, and it's actually a very popular alternative — particularly for environments that require:

  • Cross-hypervisor DR (e.g., Hyper-V ↔ VMware)
  • Simplified, low RPO/RTO replication
  • DR between on-prem datacenters, cloud, or hybrid
  • Continuous data protection (CDP) with journal-based recovery

Using Zerto with Hyper-V (SCVMM or Standalone)

Supported Environment

Zerto supports:

  • Hyper-V 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, 2022
  • SCVMM-managed or standalone Hyper-V
  • Replication between Hyper-V → Hyper-V, Hyper-V → VMware, or Hyper-V → Azure/AWS

Zerto installs Zerto Virtual Replication Appliances (VRAs) on each Hyper-V host and a Zerto Virtual Manager (ZVM), which integrates with SCVMM.


How Zerto Compares to SRM/ASR

Feature

Zerto

VMware SRM

Azure Site Recovery (ASR)

Hyper-V Support

Yes

No

Yes

Cross-hypervisor replication

Yes (e.g., Hyper-V → VMware)

No

No

RPO

Seconds (CDP)

Minutes (Snapshot based)

Minutes (depends on policy)

RTO

Minutes

Minutes

Minutes to hours

Orchestration

Yes (boot order, scripting)

Yes

Yes

Failover Testing

Yes (non-disruptive)

Yes

Yes

Journal-based rollback

Yes (seconds to 30 days)

No

Limited

Licensing

Zerto subscription or term

VMware SRM + vSphere Rep.

Azure pay-as-you-go


High-Level Zerto for Hyper-V Architecture

Site A (Primary Hyper-V)
├── Hyper-V Hosts with VRAs
├── SCVMM (optional)
└── Zerto Virtual Manager (ZVM)
     └── Manages VPGs, orchestration, journal, reporting
 
<-- Replication over WAN -->
 
Site B (Recovery Hyper-V, VMware, or Cloud)
├── Hyper-V Hosts with VRAs (or VMware or Azure/AWS)
└── ZVM Peer

Recovery Orchestration in Zerto

  • Create Virtual Protection Groups (VPGs) — similar to SRM protection groups
  • Set boot order, scripts, and IP reconfiguration
  • Built-in test failover, move, and failover buttons
  • Journal-based rollback: failover to any point in time (within journal window, e.g., 7 days)

Pros of Zerto for Hyper-V Environments

  • No snapshot impact – near real-time block-level replication
  • Cross-platform flexibility – even future migrations to/from VMware or cloud
  • Superior granularity for ransomware recovery (down to seconds)
  • Non-disruptive testing – run full DR test anytime

Considerations

  • Cost: Zerto is a third-party solution and may cost more than ASR (especially if you're already in Azure).
  • Licensing: Requires licensing per VM or host.
  • Infrastructure: Requires dedicated VRA and ZVM setup at both sites.

Bottom Line using Zerto

  • Cross-platform DR flexibility
  • RPOs of seconds
  • Granular recovery (journal-based)
  • Faster failover testing and orchestration than ASR
  • Cost Analysis needed fo budgets and long-term viability

 


No comments:

Post a Comment